Follow Techotopia on Twitter

On-line Guides
All Guides
eBook Store
iOS / Android
Linux for Beginners
Office Productivity
Linux Installation
Linux Security
Linux Utilities
Linux Virtualization
Linux Kernel
System/Network Admin
Programming
Scripting Languages
Development Tools
Web Development
GUI Toolkits/Desktop
Databases
Mail Systems
openSolaris
Eclipse Documentation
Techotopia.com
Virtuatopia.com
Answertopia.com

How To Guides
Virtualization
General System Admin
Linux Security
Linux Filesystems
Web Servers
Graphics & Desktop
PC Hardware
Windows
Problem Solutions
Privacy Policy

  




 

 

Section 1.6
The Modern User Interface


WHEN COMPUTERS WERE FIRST INTRODUCED, ordinary people -- including most programmers -- couldn't get near them. They were locked up in rooms with white-coated attendants who would take your programs and data, feed them to the computer, and return the computer's response some time later. When timesharing -- where the computer switches its attention rapidly from one person to another -- was invented in the 1960s, it became possible for several people to interact directly with the computer at the same time. On a timesharing system, users sit at "terminals" where they type commands to the computer, and the computer types back its response. Early personal computers also used typed commands and responses, except that there was only one person involved at a time. This type of interaction between a user and a computer is called a command-line interface.

Today, of course, most people interact with computers in a completely different way. They use a Graphical User Interface, or GUI. The computer draws interface components on the screen. The components include things like windows, scroll bars, menus, buttons, and icons. Usually, a mouse is used to manipulate such components. Assuming that you are reading these notes on a computer, you are no doubt already familiar with the basics of graphical user interfaces!

A lot of GUI interface components have become fairly standard. That is, they have similar appearance and behavior on many different computer platforms including Macintosh, Windows, and various UNIX window systems. Java programs, which are supposed to run on many different platforms without modification to the program, can use all the standard GUI components. They might vary in appearance from platform to platform, but their functionality should be identical on any computer on which the program runs.

Below is a very simple Java program -- actually an "applet," since it is running right here in the middle of a page -- that shows a few standard GUI interface components. There are four components that you can interact with: a button, a checkbox, a text field, and a pop-up menu. These components are labeled. There are a few other components in the applet. The labels themselves are components (even though you can't interact with them). The right half of the applet is a text area component, which can display multiple lines of text. In fact, in Java terminology, the whole applet is itself considered to be a "component." Try clicking on the button and on the checkbox, and try selecting an item from the pop-up menu. You will see a message in the text area about each action that you perform. You can type in the text field, but you might have to click on it first to activate it. When you press return while typing in the text field, you will see a message in the text area:

(Applet "GUIDemo" would be displayed here
if Java were available.)

Now, Java actually has two complete sets of GUI components. One of these, the AWT or Abstract Windowing Toolkit, was available in the original version of Java. The other, which is known as Swing, is included in Java version 1.2 or later. Here is a version of the applet that uses Swing instead of the AWT. If you see the above applet but just see a blank area here, it means that you are using a Web browser that uses an older version of Java:

(Applet "GUIDemo2" would be displayed here
if Java were available.)

As you interact with the GUI components in these applets, you generate "events." For example, clicking a push button generates an event. Each time an event is generated, a message is sent to the applet telling it that the event has occurred, and the applet responds according to its program. In fact, the program consists mainly of "event handlers" that tell the applet how to respond to various types of events. In this example, the applets have been programmed to respond to each event by displaying a message in the text area.

The use of the term "message" here is deliberate. Messages, as you saw in the previous section, are sent to objects. In fact, Java GUI components are implemented as objects. Java includes many predefined classes that represent various types of GUI components. Some of these classes are subclasses of others. Here is a diagram showing some of the GUI classes in the AWT and their relationships:

Don't worry about the details for now, but try to get some feel about how object-oriented programming and inheritance are used here. Note that all the GUI classes are subclasses, directly or indirectly, of a class called Component. Two of the direct subclasses of Component themselves have subclasses. The classes TextArea and TextField, which have certain behaviors in common, are grouped together as subclasses of TextComponent. The class named Container refers to components that can contain other components. The Applet class is, indirectly, a subclass of Container since applets can contain components such as buttons and text fields.

Just from this brief discussion, perhaps you can see how GUI programming can make effective use of object-oriented design. In fact, GUI's, with their "visible objects," are probably a major factor contributing to the popularity of OOP.

Programming with GUI components and events is one of the most interesting aspects of Java. However, we will spend several chapters on the basics before returning to this topic in Chapter 6.


[ Next Section | Previous Section | Chapter Index | Main Index ]

 
 
  Published under free license. Design by Interspire